After ICAT implementation, there was a decrease in use of force incidents, citizen injuries, and officer injuries. Which set of decreases occurred?

After ICAT implementation, there was a decrease in use of force incidents, citizen injuries, and officer injuries. Which set of decreases occurred?

• A. 28%; 26%; 36%
• B. 10%; 15%; 20%
• C. 5%; 5%; 5%
• D. 50%; 40%; 30%

Answer: (A)

ICAT de-escalation training aims to prevent situations from escalating, so you’d expect improvements across multiple related outcomes. When officers are better at communicating, using time and distance, and disengaging safely, force is used less often, which also lowers the chance of injuries to both the public and the officers. The set of decreases that fits this pattern is a 28% drop in use-of-force incidents, a 26% drop in citizen injuries, and a 36% drop in officer injuries. This shows a consistent improvement across all three areas, with the largest gain in officer safety reflecting fewer dangerous encounters overall. The other patterns would imply uneven or much smaller changes that don’t align with the broad, interconnected impact ICAT training is intended to have.

ICAT de-escalation training aims to prevent situations from escalating, so you’d expect improvements across multiple related outcomes. When officers are better at communicating, using time and distance, and disengaging safely, force is used less often, which also lowers the chance of injuries to both the public and the officers.

The set of decreases that fits this pattern is a 28% drop in use-of-force incidents, a 26% drop in citizen injuries, and a 36% drop in officer injuries. This shows a consistent improvement across all three areas, with the largest gain in officer safety reflecting fewer dangerous encounters overall. The other patterns would imply uneven or much smaller changes that don’t align with the broad, interconnected impact ICAT training is intended to have.